Daily Archives: April 19th, 2015

Taqleed Of The Four Imaams.

           Taqleed Of The Four Imaams

QUESTION : Did Rasulullaah (sallAllaahu alaihi wasallam) give an order to follow any of the four Imaams of Mazhab?

What an erroneous question! The question should be phrased thus Which proof from amongst the four valid proofs in the Shariah indicates making Taqleed of any of the four Imaams? From where did the leader of the  Mas`oodi sect concoct such an silly and ignorant question?

Firstly, one should understand the following: the basis of the Rawaafidh (Shia) sect’s Aqeedah (beliefs) is that their chosen Imaams are from Allaah Ta`ala, just as the Ambiyaa (alaihi salaam) are chosen by Allaah Ta`ala.

The question put to them from the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat, is Just as the names and mantles of prophethood of the Ambiyaa are clearly given in the Qur`an Shareef and Ahadith,

similarly, you should prove from the Qur`aan Shareef and Ahadith the mantle of Imaamat of your twelve Imaams, which you claim to have been given by Allaah Ta`ala.

This question of the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat is completely correct and appropriate, because it is in conformity to their claim. However, the Rawaafidhis are 100% helpless in presenting an answer to this question, and they will remain helpless until the day of Qiyaamah, Insha-Allaahul Azeez.

Now, to hide their inability in presenting an answer to the question, they present such silly counter-questions, such as You show us your proof of making Taqleed of the four Imaams! This question is completely inappropriate, because the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat does not hold belief in the four Imaam Imaams as do the Shias of their twelve Imaams.

Nevertheless, the Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat says to them: Your question is based on lies. Firstly, you should prove from our reliable Kitaabs that we believe that the four Imaams are also chosen by Allaah Ta`ala. However, they cannot substantiate their false claim. Their question has no relevance to our claim.

The founder of the Mas`oodi sect  also held similar beliefs as the Rawaafidhis, that the Imaams are chosen by Allaah Ta`ala, hence he seeks from us proof for the four Imaams from Qur`aan Shareef and Ahadith. Our reply to him is the same as it is to the Rawaafidhis:

Firstly you should prove, from our reliable Kitaabs, that we hold the same beliefs regarding our Imaams as you hold regarding your twelve Imaams. Since your belief is that the twelve Imaams are specially chosen by Allaah Ta`ala, it follows that, you must be able to present reliable proof from the Qur`aan Shareef and Ahadith that they are as such and that an order has been given for us to follow them and accept them.

Also, those whom you (Ghair Muqalliddeen) accept as being (valid) Imaams, like Imaams Abdullaah bin Mubarak, Shafi, Daar Qutni, Baihaqi, Ahmed bin Hambal, Yahya bin Adam, Abu Haatim and Haakim (rahmatullahi alaihim), in which Hadith has Nabi (sallAllaahu alaihi wasallam) given an order to follow them?

If rejection of Taqleed is based on this premise, that Nabi (sallAllaahu alaihi wasallam) has not expressly sanctioned the Imaams, then tell us, the seven different types of Qiraat of the Qur`aan Shareef, which is accepted throughout the Islaamic world; in which authentic Hadith are all these different types and their correct recitals stated?

If anyone from your sect has an eighth Qiraat, then present an authentic Hadith, which has an unbroken chain of narrators to substantiate it. Or are you going to reject the recital of the Qur`aan Shareef also upon this principle of yours?

If rejection of Taqleed is based on this premise, that the names of the four Imaams are not stated in any Hadith, then tell us, does the names of Imaams Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmidhi, Abu Dawood, Nisai and Ibn Maajah (rahmatullahi alaihim), appear in any of these six Authentic Kitaabs of Hadith?

If not, then according to your logic, these personalities and their Kitaabs should also be rejected.

Show us from an authentic Hadith, that Rasulullaah (sallAllaahu alaihi wasallam) has forbidden the following of the four Imaams of Fiqh.

screenshot-getintopc com 2015-04-19 14-34-29        


Site Settings ‹ adilniaxi. This site is about knowledge.. Islamic and others — WordPress.com

Site Settings ‹ adilniaxi. This site is about knowledge.. Islamic and others — WordPress.com.

Human with a dog’s face..

Human with a dog’s face.

Human with a dog’s face
Hazrat’e Sayyiduna Ibrahim Bin Maisarah (radi Allahu ta’ala anhu) has said that those individuals who like to take part in obscene conversation, on the Day of Judgement will come with their faces as those of dogs.  (Kimiya-e-Sa’adat)

A ban on entry to HeavenThe Holy Prophet (sallallahu ta’ala alaihi wa’sallam) has said: “Entry to Heaven is banned for that individual who uses foul language while talking with others.

The benefit of speaking about good things
The Holy Prophet (sallallahu ta’ala alaihi wa’sallam) has said: “In heaven there huge palaces whose interior can be seen from the outside the palace and the exterior from inside the palace.  Somebody asked: “O Prophet of Allah (sallallahu ta’ala alaihi wa’sallam) for who are these made?”  The reply was: “For those

who talk about good things”.  (Tirmizi)  

Those Islamic brothers and Islamic sisters are indeed very lucky who use their tongue for only speaking about good things and give Naikey ki Dawat to as many people as possible.  Those people who have the habit of having obscene discussions on the topic of marriage life or those people who like taking part in obscene talks or perhaps those who just enjoy listening to such conversations, those who have a habit of using dirty and foul language, and those who like watching films and dramas which usually these include obscene dialogues and scenes should read the following narrations again and again and should feel scared of the wrath of Allah (az’zawajal).  It is narrated in Kimiya-e-Sa’adat that some people will be taken to Hell.  There will be a smell coming out of’ their mouths and it will spread around Hell.  It will be so bad that the other people in Hell will ask who are these people?  They will get a reply that these are those unlucky individuals who used to use obscene sentences, while having a conversation and they were fond of visiting those places where obscenity was the main topic of discussion”.